An Interview with Neil Finn

Neil Finn knew he was onto something when, in listening back to some homemade grooves he’d made with his wife, the couple was soon dancing together as if in primal response. He’d not composed like this before, not in Crowded House or, before that, Split Enz, nor in any of his various side and solo projects over the past three decades. Yet these spare and spontaneous jams, which consisted of Neil and Sharon Finn on drums and bass, respectively — instruments neither had any experience with whatsoever — showed promise. 

And thus the idea for Pajama Club was born.

“It was very fresh as an approach, as a way to start a song from drums and bass. Work from there up,” Finn explains. A bit of cut-and-paste editing refined the raw jams, which he then embellished further while on tour last year with Crowded House. “Late at night in my hotel room I worked on some of them,” he recalls, “added a few chords here, a few riffs here, a couple little vocal ideas, and realized they took it really well. They suggested quite good things.”

Rounded out by indie keyboardist Sean Donnelly — former Grates drummer Alana Skyring has been recruited for live gigs — Pajama Club delivers its eponymous debut this week to the States. And with its experimental edge underscored by Neil Finn's melodic-pop songcraft, the album is musical escapism at its finest and most fun. “There’s enough in life that occupies the rational part of the brain,” reasons Finn. “It’s good to stimulate the other side with a song.”  

Why did you and Sharon form a rhythm section rather than picking up instruments more familiar to each of you?   

I don’t think we would’ve jammed at all in any other capacity. It wasn’t something we planned to do, but we’re really evenly matched on bass and drums in the sense that both of us are absolute beginners. And so therefore having a jam was a very appealing thing anyway just for the sheer hell of it. I tape everything I ever do, and there was something about the sound of it that was also quite fresh and kind of inspiring for me. It just seemed to be suggestive of some new angles, which are always a joy to discover after a lot of years of being a songwriter. 

And it could’ve easily, in theory, gone the other way. As neither of you were accustomed to your instruments, it could have just resulted in a clash of noise. 

Yeah, to some extent we weren’t expecting much. [Laughs] But some of the greatest things happen there. I think Sharon’s always had a very good sense of rhythm because she’s a great dancer. And her approach to bass is not to play that many notes at all, but just to find a groove that feels good and stick to it. That’s a very free place to be. There’s something about bass when it’s reduced to its purely rhythmic elements as long as the feel is really good. And with my drumming I think it was the same; I was just attempting to keep a feel going. I wasn’t flash enough to put many fills in. So I just keep it really simple, and somehow the two of us formed a sound. Before there were even songs we felt there was something quite strong there. 

On songs like “Daylight” and “Tell Me What You Want,” in particular, yours and Sharon’s voice create a unique dynamic. Was it something you had to keep in mind as you wrote, who would sing lead or who would sing which parts? 

We kind of had to make it up as we went along. It was a very nice feeling to not know what Pajama Club sounded like and to be able to follow our nose and our instincts. I knew that I wanted to get Sharon singing, but we didn’t know what bits would suit her, and we discovered that through trial and error. Some things just seemed to really fit with her voice. I also tried to use my voice in ways that I don’t normally use it, so there’s some unusual tones and characteristics in there. Like you rightly point out, I think there’s a really nice sound that’s made when Sharon and I sing together. That was quite a nice discovery. It’s got a really good blend, even singing unison. 

Did you write all the lyrics?  

I wrote most of the lyrics. She was there casting an ear on everything and coming up with the odd line — just the good ones, as she says. She deferred to my experience in that regard, I suppose, but I was definitely influenced by trying to give her things that she would enjoy singing. There are a few angles on there that are quite unusual for what I would write in normal circumstances. 

Can you perceive any evolution in your songwriting over the course of your career? 

It would be very hard to be objective about, but I’m aware that my music has changed over the years. Certain new things have been added. It’s always mysterious. If I take pleasure and, say, pride in a song from the past often it is I can’t really remember how it came. And I don’t really know that I couldn’t do it again. You do sometimes battle with the idea that, on a day when you can’t write, you go, “Well maybe my best work is behind me.” And then you have a real breakthrough one day and go, “I think this one could be the best thing I’ve ever done.” So it’s a continual process of picking yourself up from feeling worthless and then stopping yourself from getting too big a head. 

Is songwriting something you enjoy? 

That’s a tough question because like anything that’s worthwhile there’s always going to be struggle. But I’m compelled by it. I love it, and I find it totally fascinating. You might as well just ask somebody who’s in a long-term relationship whether they enjoy being in a long-term relationship. There are so many aspects to it that are not necessarily straightforward or always harmonious. Songwriting can be the most desperate feeling on earth if you’re not getting anything done. But the moment of breakthrough, you have a little revelation… Inspiration only comes to those that work anyway, I think. If you just sit around and wait for all the good bits to happen; I think it’d be a rare person that’s got that much a gift. 

Do you find that songs you’ve written resonate in different ways with you over time when you perform them? 

Oh, absolutely. In the right circumstances — an intimate setting perhaps — some of the more obscure songs that never really had a lot of attention at the time rise to the top of the show. There’s a song from the first Finn record, which is quite an obscure record actually, called “Only Talking Sense,” which we never got to play much but I’ve been playing it quite a bit lately solo. For some reason it just seems to have a tremendous power and seems to really get people excited, whether or not they know it.

A lot of your best work doesn’t necessarily get noticed at the time. There are circumstances that create… Maybe the stars line up, people take notice. They’re all paying attention. Certain songs rise in those times, and they become your hits. But I think in a parallel universe there are a whole lot of other songs that you write that are potentially equal songs, but don’t come at a time when people are paying attention. But they resonate over a long period of time, and I think they sometimes have their day a lot longer. It’s a good thing to remember and put some faith in. 

In reviewing a Crowded House show last year in Florida on the Intriguer tour, I noted that you never once came across as if playing the hits — and you must have played “Don’t Dream It’s Over” hundreds of times by now — was an obligatory gesture just to perform the new material. 

I have long believed that every time you play music you have to put the same level of commitment and intensity into it or it won’t be good music. Which is not to say that you try too hard, but you focus as much as you can. And I would say the same thing to the band when we’re in rehearsal. I just don’t accept than you can go through the motions of something, just to learn it and that’s okay. Every time you perform you should perform like you really mean it. 

You also seemed to appreciate that so many people have taken your songs to mean something very personal to them. 

That’s a nice, beautiful mystery about it as well. My lyrics, I suppose, are fairly open-ended and some might say obscure — 

But that obscurity allows for those kinds of connections. 

I think it does, because it leaves doors open for people [so] they can wander through them and make of them what they will. I think back to when I was listening to music as a teenager and I never really fully embraced the entire meaning of a song. For a long time I would listen to it, and I would love it without wanting to know what all the lyrics were about. Certain lines would pique my imagination and send me somewhere. 

Ultimately, of course, you don’t know what the songs you've written are going to mean to people. 

That’s right. You can’t choose who your children are going to sleep with.

Read on...

Concert Review: A Night Full of Hits with Crowded House

Neil Finn (left) and Nick Seymour (right) of Crowded House, 7/28/10 at Ruth Eckerd Hall

The house was anything but crowded on Wednesday night with Ruth Eckerd Hall’s 2,100 seats only half-filled, unfortunately, but Neil Finn and company engaged the faithful with as much sincerity and showmanship as they would a offer a stadium filled to the rafters. For two solid hours, Crowded House—rounded out by bassist Nick Seymour, keyboardist Mark Hart, and drummer Matt Sherrod—culled their back catalog while introducing tracks from their latest album, Intriguer, to deliver a melodic-pop master class and an all-around impeccable performance.

Finn sang with marked consideration, never coming across like revisiting the band’s past hits was an obligatory means just to play the new material. This song may mean a great deal to someone here tonight, he seemed to suggest. And the hits—“World Where You Live,” “Fall At Your Feet,” and “Something So Strong,” among them—were in abundance, much to the delight of everyone, who added their voices at just about every opportunity.

“Thank you for singing with us,” Finn said, after “Don’t Dream It’s Over,” visibly touched. A request from a fan in the front rows for “Message To My Girl” yielded the premier highlight of the night, with Finn on keyboard giving the Split Enz classic a slow, sensuous treatment. 

The new album didn’t command as much of the performance as one may have at first anticipated (yielding a mere four songs), but what ultimately made the setlist fared quite well. “Either Side of the World” proved an early standout, with the melodic nuances of its studio version rendered even more pronounced and soulful on the stage. As well, with its wistful distinction, “Twice If You’re Lucky” felt instantly familiar, as if the band had been playing it for years.

The encore saw Crowded House, along with openers Lawrence Arabia, paying tribute to the recently deceased musician and producer, Ben Keith, with a cover of “Old Man,” one of several Neil Young classics to which he’d originally contributed. Poignant renditions of “Not the Girl You Think You Are” and “Better Be Home Soon” followed, culminating in a most-fitting farewell.

— photo: Donald Gibson

Read on...

An Interview with Nick Seymour of Crowded House

With the release of their latest LP, Intriguer, Crowded House have, in a sense, come full circle. The album, which hit North American retail and online outlets earlier this week—it was issued elsewhere around the world last month—finds the Australian-based quartet drawing on many of the characteristic qualities that distinguished them over two decades ago.

Led by vocalist and principal songwriter/guitarist Neil Finn, Crowded House generated both critical praise and immense popular success beginning with their eponymous 1985 debut, ultimately scoring such hit singles as "Don't Dream It's Over," "Something So Strong," and "Better Be Home Soon," among many others. By the mid-nineties, though, Finn wished to pursue other endeavors and, in so doing, broke up the band. It wasn't until 2006, following the suicide of drummer and founding member Paul Hester the year before, that Crowded House reemerged with Time On Earth, which began as a Neil Finn solo project to which the remaining members later contributed.

Intriguer is more a concerted effort of the band—who along with Finn includes keyboardist/guitarist Mark Hart, drummer Matt Sherrod, and bassist Nick Seymour—and its melody-rich arrangements, coupled with Finn's compelling lyricism, recall quintessential Crowded House.

The new album’s release inadvertently coincided with the start of the band's North American tour, a daunting scenario for any established act not wanting to overwhelm audiences with a lot of unfamiliar material though, at the same time, maintaining a desire to perform their latest work. "Playing live has to be a challenge," Seymour contends, underscoring the point that nothing about a Crowded House concert is particularly set in stone anyway. "The setlist changes most nights. There’s a stable of, say, six songs that we always include in a set, but we can play for two hours—that’s usually the length of a show—and it takes many turns. I think audiences are set to expect that."

How has the dynamic in the band, now with Matt on drums, changed from the days of, say, Temple of Low Men? Has your approached evolved any or is it similar to how it was back then?

The approach to rendering the music, to finding an arrangement, is pretty much the same. We do takes and we try not to make any mistakes and we try to perform the song from start to finish as best we can. And then [we] scrutinize the takes: “Take three was better than take one.” That has stayed the same. We record to tape, still. We shift tempos according to how Neil feels singing the song. Most of those things are fairly traditional. And that hasn’t changed since Temple of Low Men. That’s a mode we can’t really corrupt or change. Because the minute we try to get the drums separate from the vocal the integrity of the way that the song sings is self-conscious. It’s suddenly challenged and it doesn’t sound right.

Matt is a very different kind of drummer from Paul in a lot of ways, but there are so many similar aspects to their upbringing, which is really extraordinary. I was amazed at the hybrid of music that they grew up with that were similar. They’re similar in some respects and then wildly different in others… When we met Matt, we weren’t trying to replace Paul Hester. We hadn’t been together as a band for some time. We were just trying to meet a drummer that we could instinctively go to and chase [an] abstract enjoyment of jamming. He’s not a particularly great brushes player like Paul was, but he’s an incredible polyrhythm-type player. We’re really lucky we met Matt, that’s for sure.

What does Intriguer, as an album title, mean or intend to suggest?

“The Intriguer” was an actual song at one point. It comes from a night when Neil was out having a drink with a very well-known cartoonist/satirist in Australia, Michael Leunig. Neil and he are friends; they’ve worked together on a couple of projects in the past. They were out having a drink. [It was like] when the conversation just sort of stops and you’re looking around in the bar or just watching out the window; you’re not talking very much, but you’re seeing these little random asides taking place in the city. The story is that whenever there was an alarm or a crash or some kind of accident—a moment in the restaurant or whatever that's drawn attention—Neil has observed a guy standing in a window nearby and Michael’s observed the same person. And they ended up having this abstract conversation about there is governance over dysfunction, [that] this intriguing character oversees these random events just to keep humans on their toes. This dark figure became known as The Intriguer. Neil wrote a song about it and, as it turned out, the song didn’t turn out as well as we thought or capture it as well as the idea of the specter of The Intriguer [being] a great umbrella essence of the new record.

There's a minimalist, organic, almost-meditative quality to the new music. It's a consistent vibe. Was that something you set out to achieve?

I wouldn’t say that we ever have a criteria for how we go about capturing the time in the studio, the energy in the studio. But often there will be an atmosphere that falls into place [of which] we tend to recognize its merit and really grasp at happy accidents that occur. The pressure in the studio of all being in the right place at the right time together is such that you’d almost be sabotaging that potential by having a criteria or a manifesto... It’s just a certain magic that will occur at the time and then make sense after the fact. It is very intuitive and very instinctive. If there is some kind of consistent atmosphere going on from one song to the next, it’s really as a result of possibly the season, what we were eating, the sense of camaraderie and bonhomie, the stories that were being told at the time. Often as not, when I try to piece together an illustration that is to be the cover of the CD, I have to consider all of these elements and try to come up with something that is an inherent juxtaposition to how we were feeling in the studio at the time. It’s incredibly hard, but it makes perfect sense once it’s done.

Read on...